‘The Snooper’s Charter’ – Part Two: Finding a needle in a haystack? | The Friday Article

Yesterday, the Investigatory Powers Committee published its report on the so-called ‘snooper’s charter’ or Investigatory Powers Bill. In its report, the committee states that a lot of work still needs to be done to the proposed legislation before it should be put before Parliament. Now that more details have emerged about Theresa May’s bill – and there has been more scrutiny of it – I thought it would be worth discussing this bill in more detail.

First of all, the question of how Internet Service Providers will collect, store and manage this data is still yet to be explained. I won’t go into too much detail about this element as I talked about it in part one (read it here).

Similarly, the idea of the government storing this mass amounts of data is excessive – why should everyone’s data be collected just in the hope of finding a few bad eggs? (Nick Clegg shared a similar opinion, as mentioned in this BBC article).

However, whilst these are just some criticisms of the bill, there is one aspect of the ‘snooper’s charter’ which sounds promising. At the moment – during my university course – I’m learning about how the state’s powers are split into three branches: the executive, the legislative and the judiciary. All are separate from one another.

One feature of the bill is how operations which have been agreed by the Home Secretary, Theresa May, can be prevented by a board of judges. This separation (as mentioned above) is the perfect way to ensure that the actions of the Home Secretary and Government are ethical. But whilst this is a good aspect of the bill, I remain sceptical.

You can find out more about the Investigatory Powers Bill and committee in this insightful BBC article, here.

What do you think of Theresa May’s ‘Investigatory Powers Bill’? Should it be passed? Is it ethical? Comment below!



2 thoughts on “‘The Snooper’s Charter’ – Part Two: Finding a needle in a haystack? | The Friday Article

  1. In the words of Tom Jones, Snooping, What is it Good For? Absolutely Nothin!
    Well mostly.
    Time and time again the erosion of civil liberties benefits only certain people, and it isn’t 99% of people.
    And with all the harvested data, they can only use so much of it.

    Liked by 1 person

Think Outside the Box...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.